공동주택의 공용관리비와 장기수선충당금 부과액에 미치는 비용요인：부산시 공동주택을 대상으로

[Purpose]Among the apartment houses subject to compulsory management located in Busan in 2020, about 61.5% of the apartment houses subject to compulsory management for more than 11 years and less than 30 years after the date of approval for use.Therefore, construction according to the long－term repair plan will increase in the future, and the amount of long－term repair allowance will be increased. However, some apartment owners and representatives of residential self－governing organizations will be burdened with an increase in the amount of long－term repair allowance. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyze and confirm variables that affect common management fees and long－term repair allowance, thereby providing basic data to help establish rational and objective financing plans and impose amounts. [Methodology]To this end, information on the 2020 public management fee of 1,114 complexes and the long－term repair allowance of 1,113 complexes of apartment houses registered in the apartment management information system were collected and used.Multiple regression analysis was conducted to confirm the effect of each of these independent variables on the total common management fees and the long－term repair allowance. Independent variables include management cost items(labor costs, elevator maintenance costs, repair costs, facility maintenance costs, safety inspection costs, disaster prevention costs, consignment management costs, miscellaneous income). At this time, multiple regression analysis was classified and analyzed according to the management type(self－management vs. consigned management). [Findings]As a result, labor costs, elevator maintenance costs, repair costs, facility maintenance costs, and consignment management costs had a (＋) effect on the total common management fees(consigned management). On the other hand, labor costs had a (－) effect on the amount of long－term repair allowance imposed(consigned management). Repair costs, facility maintenance costs, and miscellaneous income had a (＋) effect on the long－term repair allowance imposed (consigned management). In addition, in the case where the total common management fee was used as a dependent variable, the independent variables(labor cost, elevator maintenance costs, repair cost, facility maintenance cost) that had a valid effect on both self－management and consigned management were the same(coefficient ＋). But in the case of long－term repair allowance as a dependent variable, the independent variables that effectively affect consigned management were labor cost, repair cost, facility maintenance cost, and miscellaneous income, but in the case of self－management, the effective variables were labor cost, elevator maintenance cost, repair cost, and safety inspection cost. [Implications]This study is different from previous studies in that it was analyzed by adding miscellaneous income as a variable affecting the amount of long－term repair allowance, and it will be meaningful to present practical criteria for selecting items to be tried to reduce the burden of long－term repair allowance and common management fee.