허위조작정보 규제방안에 관한 이해관계자들의 인식 연구 새로운 규제의 필요성 및 법적규제 방안에 대한 심층인터뷰 분석을 중심으로

This study aims to find a way to design the measures for regulating disinformation in a way that minimizes social conflict and secures effectiveness. This study conducted in-depth interviews with those representing each type based on the three types of perception derived from the research on the types of perceptions of stakeholders in disinformation. How they evaluate the current regulatory system or the necessity for new regulation on disinformation, and what kind of perception they have about the content of the regulation bill currently being submitted to the National Assembly was reviewed. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the difference in perception of the necessity for new regulation is due to the difference in the evaluation of the current normative situation in journalism or the effectiveness of the current regulatory system. It was analyzed that there were many negative perceptions about the contents of the regulation legislation that applies punitive damages to disinformation in media reports. Based on the results of the analysis, a regulatory policy design plan that can narrow the various positions and differences of opinion related to the regulation of disinformation was suggested.