차세대 전자소송과 개인정보 보호 - 지능형 챗봇･사법정보 공유 절차에의 블록체인 기술 도입안을 중심으로 -

Recently, a plan to build a next-generation electronic litigation system was announced. However, there is a risk of personal information leakage through third-party hacking in the intelligent chatbot and judicial information sharing procedure among this system. In both procedures, when blockchain is applied to protect personal information, institutions or centers must, in principle, obtain consent from users to provide personal information. However, if the permission block chain is applied to both procedures, there is a possibility that users' consent to provide personal information may be exempted. In order to protect personal information in the intelligent chatbot process, private, consortium, and public blockchain introduction plans have been reviewed, and the public introduction is the most reasonable. In the case of public grafting of intelligent chatbot procedures, it is most suitable for the next-generation company-wide litigation system in that there are no restrictions such as users and chatbots. The goal of decentralization was by introducing public and private keys to users and chatbots in the intelligent chatbot procedure. Even when considering these points, public gives safety in terms of personal information. However, even in the case of a public key, there is a risk in terms of personal information as it is linked to the user's IP in the future. However, this hacking technology takes a long time to succeed and it takes a long time to be commercialized. Therefore, public grafting is more reasonable for intelligent chatbot procedures. There is also the possibility of leakage of personal information in the judicial information sharing process. In order to overcome this problem, private, public, and consortium block chain grafting plans have been reviewed, and the consortium grafting plan is reasonable. In the case of a consortium grafting plan to the judicial information sharing procedure, the sharing status is maintained under security between authorized users, the judicial information sharing center, and various organizations. Therefore, the risk of leakage of users' personal information is low and the work speed is fast. Since agencies such as the Ministry of Public Administration and Security and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport are in a competitive relationship with each other, the cost of sending and receiving electronic documents, etc., can be set cheaply. Of course, in the case of a consortium, there are some insecure factors in terms of personal information protection, but the advantages over these limitations are considerable. It is also encouraging that the chain can offset personal information security by grafting Germany's dmail system. Therefore, the consortium grafting proposal is more reasonable in this procedure.