자동적 행정행위의 현황과 전망

As artificial intelligence penetrates all sectors of society, concerns and expectations are intersecting. There is a high possibility that artificial intelligence will be used in public administration field because it is aimed at a large number of people and text data such as laws and legal precedents are accumulated. So far the study of fully automatic administrative activity has been continued in administrative law. However, these studies hastily anticipate the stage of completely autonomic administration without human intervention and have repeated abstract discussions. Now is the time to establish a practical approach for each administrative field, starting with the fundamental question of whether automatic administration is possible and necessary as a more realistic step. The purpose of this article is to examine the automated or digitized status of our administrative activities and to explore what the legal system should be to respond feasible changes. Therefore we firtstly intend to collect and understand related studies such as electronic administration and automatic administrative actions, and also analyze various conceptual definitions related of administrative actions. In addition, laws and regulations of electronic or automatic administrative actions are examined. In the next chapter, in order to specifically grasp the current status of automic administrative action, the significance and problem of electronic notification activities, including the National Secretary Service, which is currently most widely used as a public administrative service, are derived and legal characteristics are identified. And then, various types of automic administration are classified into automation of internal tasks, information providing through search engines, decision assistance by sequence prediction, and the automatic acceptance of a report. For these types, the automation stage of each administration and legal nature of administrative law are examined. Meanwhile, it will be expected that as automatic administration receives a number of complaints through automatic systems, it could approach democratic administration and ensure the same conclusion on the same conditions. Also, by guaranteeing the same conclusion on the same conditions, it will be able to meet the principle of equality. There are two suggestions in lieu of the conclusion. The first one is researches on individual legislation for fully automatic administrative actions should be conducted proactively, the second one is opinions of experts and users in each legal field should be sufficiently reflected before building a legal AI system.