물관리기본법 상 부합성심사제도 법적 쟁점사항에 대한 연구 -통합물관리 정책실무 관점으로 접근하여-

The govern ment bodys water management policies, which were previously complicated, are moving toward the goal of integrated water management through the Fundamental Water Management Law enacted in 2019. The Fundamental Water Management Law grants authority to the Water Management Commission as an entity capable of carrying out integrated water management. The Fundamental Water Management Law, which has the highest level of national standards, and the 1st Water Management Committee, which was created based on that law, established the 1st National Fundamental Water Management Framework Plan and laid the foundation for integrated water management. However, since the comprehensive basin management plan was not established within the statutory period, it can be said that it was a half success. It is expected that the progress of true integrated water management will proceed after the establishment of the comprehensive basin management plan centered on the national framework. The law stipulates the Consistency System as a system for integrated water management. It is expected that the contents of the 1st National fundametal water framework established by the National Water Management Commission will be delivered to local governments in charge of water management in the field through the compatibility review system. To do so, a comprehensive water basin management plan must be established through thorough verification. Currently, the government anticipates that the four basin commission will review about 200 comprehensive water management plans each year and proceed with the resolution process. Howe ver, despite t he domes t ic a nd i nter nat iona l neces sit y of integrated water management, the reality is that the water management commission has a lot of homework to solve. The water management com m ission meeting, which shou ld promote u nification of water ma nagement, that is, integrated water ma nagement, through the Consistency System, is currently facing various discussions. For example, it is embroiled in various political or legal controversies, such as the legal body status and effectiveness of the water management committee, and securing independence and objectivit y. If this problem is not resolved, the compatibility Consistency System promoted by the Water Management Commission in the future may be seen with distrust not only by the participants but also by the public. It is true that the current water management commission has an incomplete and ambiguous legal status. However, as a subject for integrated water management, the necessit y was secured through sufficient prior review. As an organization to stably manage the water cycle to respond to the changing environment in the future, such as climate change, its function should be strengthened. In order to promote the policy, based on the contents of the 1st National fundametal water framework for Water Management through the short-term Consistency System, promptly establish the 1st Comprehensive Basin Management Plan and proceed with the conformity review for the policies of local governments. will have to In addition, in the long term, the Commission should secure legal independence through revisio, strengthen expertise through securing a secretariat, and implement its role as a quasi-judicial organization through conformity examination.