아모스의 정의 이해 관점에서 본 K-ESG 경영

The purpose of this study is to reinterpret Amos' perspectives on justice amd fairness in terms of corporate management, and to present the direction of supplementation and improvement of K-ESG based on this. Amos does not provide an image of corporate management, but the implications for desirable economic actions or systems presented there can be sufficiently borrowed to modern management. This study summarized these into four perspectives: sabbatical, economic and industrial structure, honest commerce, widening the gap between the rich and the poor. Reinterpretation of Amos' fairness and justice and supplementation and improvement of K-ESG based on them are as follows. First of all, K-ESG rarely considers content related to reasonable working hours, guarantees of appropriate rest, and income guarantees for essential vacation days, and remains passive in application such as compliance with legal working hours and compensation for overtime working. From the perspective of the economic structure of the time, most of the items such as shared growth, profit-sharing system, and maintaining a healthy purchase delivery relationship were not included in the K-ESG evaluation items. The honest commercial transaction perspective is included in K-ESG's ethical management sector and strategic social contribution category. However, consumer protection is one of the detailed rating guidlines, so it is necessary to raise it to the evaluation unit level. The polarization of the rich and the poor and consideration of the poor are directly linked to corporate social responsibility activities. This corresponds to the community category of K-ESG's social area.