재건축 규제완화에 대한 토지공법적 검토

In the metropolitan area, where housing sites are absolutely scarce, reconstruction is practically the only means of supplying housing. However, those who understand reconstruction simply as a means of increasing property and think negatively or who think that they must catch up with soaring real estate prices strengthen safety inspections to prevent the reconstruction project from proceeding in the first place, try to reduce the supply of housing through reconstruction by the sale price ceiling system and reconstruction charge. Therefore, in order to promote reconstruction, it is reasonable to remove the so-called three major nails (safety diagnosis, sale price ceiling system, and reconstruction charge) that hinder reconstruction. First, there are ways to lower structural safety standards and exempt safety diagnosis for buildings built before 1988, but now it is time to consider abolishing safety diagnosis boldly to revitalize the reconstruction project. Next, the sale price ceiling system for private housing sites should be abolished as soon as possible, as there is no longer any reason to exist, such as instability in real estate prices and reverse discrimination. Lastly, although some of the problems with the reconstruction charge have been removed through 2022. 9. 29. countermeasure, unconstitutional elements still remain. Therefore, it is worth considering removing the unconstitutionality through law revision or abolishing it at this chance.