주기적 감사인 지정제와 자유수임제의 비교: 감사품질을 중심으로

With the amendment of the Act on External Audit of Stock Companies, a periodic auditor designation system has been implemented since 2020 to secure auditor independence and improve audit quality. This study examines whether periodic auditor designation improves audit quality compared to the case of free auditor contract. Furthermore, this study examines the second-year’s audit quality after auditor replacement, above and beyond the initial year’s audit quality after replacement under periodic auditor designation system. Based on the sample period from 2018 to 2021, we first find no evidence that the audit quality of the initial and the second year after auditor replacement was higher for periodic designation compared to free contract cases. Second, we find little evidence that the initial audit under the periodic designation system result in improved audit quality compared to two years before the replacement or the year immediately before the replacement. Third, audit quality is found to improve in the second year of audit after periodic designation compared to two years before replacement or the year immediately before replacement. However, even in the case of free auditor contract, the audit quality improvement effect was found in the second year of audit, indicating that the improvement effect in the second year was not a unique effect of periodic designation. The difference-in-difference test results indicate that audit quality improvement effect is significantly smaller for periodic designation compared to free contract cases. We provide policy implications for authorities to judge the effectiveness of periodic auditor designation on audit quality.