관계성 범죄의 개념 및 유형과 면담 시 착안 사항에 관한 논의

Relational crimes are based on the characteristics of mutual relationships, so the perpetrator often accumulates a lot of information about the victim. The more information the perpetrator knows about the victim, the more difficult it becomes for the victim to protect himself from the perpetrator's infringement. The problem is that neither of the parties is even clearly aware of whether the current situation they are in constitutes a relationship crime. There is a tendency to accept only the unpleasant things experienced in the process of resolving one-sided or mutual conflicts or complaints. When a large risk is recognized, the damage is often already considerably accumulated. Even if the investigation is conducted belatedly, it is difficult to recover from the physical and mental damage that the victim has already suffered. That is why we need to be clear about relational crime. This is because it is possible to first clearly know what a relational crime is in order to check the start of a relational crime in a situation, what characteristics it has, and what to be wary of. Therefore, in this paper, the concept of ‘relational crime' itself, not domestic violence or stalking, was first defined. Furthermore, based on Knapp's relationship model and empirical facts in practice, a 'four-step developmental model of relational crime, (FDMRC)' was presented. Through the commentary of each step, the specific contents of FDMRC were made known, and as the concept of relational crime was defined, the types and characteristics were also distinguished. I also gave advice to working-level officials investigating in the field. The perpetrators of relational crimes are often mired in a distorted perception that they are also victims. The problem is that if only mechanical investigation and punishment are received, this misperception will not improve and the recidivism phenomenon is likely to continue. Golden time, which can improve misperception, is considered to be in the interview stage, the starting point of the investigation. Through interviews, ‘self-disclosure’ should be drawn so that perpetrators can make rational judgments and objective thinking. As a means, it was recommended to combine framework-building interviews, SUE techniques, rapport, and policy suggestions for relational crimes were also presented.