형법 제16조 법률 착오와 법률 부지 문제

Professor Moon Chae-gyu's last dissertation in his academic life is “Article 16 of the Criminal Code: Legal Errors and Legal Grounds.” Professor Moon Chae-kyu asks two questions. (1) Is the site of the law exempt from the application of Article 16 of the Criminal Code? (2) Is the precedent consistent? Thoroughly analyze and critique theories and precedents. And insists on a new path. In Professor Moon Chae-gyu's thesis, we can meet the meticulousness of a criminal law scholar. Criminal Law Judicial Precedents, Vicissitudes, Criticism, Issues, and Alternatives. It is an article that cannot be written without academic competence. This topic cannot be contained on page 14. “The old habit of dualization of the site of the law, dare to break away.” I felt the dignity of a scholar. This is Professor Moon Chae-gyu's academic style. It's a pity that I didn't hear more of Professor Moon Chae-gyu's eloquence. Professor Moon Chae-gyu's gem-like writing is the ‘pearl necklace’ that he dedicated his entire life to. This paper first dealt with Professor Moon Chae-kyu and the retirement age(II). I looked back on the professorship. Next, I reviewed the paper with Professor Chae-kyu Moon(III). Article 16 of the Criminal Code Error of Law and the Supreme Court on October 13, 2011. Judgment 2010 Do15260 and Professor Moon Chae-gyu's verdict. Lastly, we introduced the conversation between Professor Moon Chae-kyu and his students. It is a hypothetical dialogue about legal ignorance, legal grounds, legal errors, and legal interpretation. The conclusion is to Professor Moon Chae-gyu.