ISA몰입 측정도구 타당화: 국내 화학 산업 종사자를 대상으로

The purpose of this study is to examine the appropriateness of the ISA engagement scale for the Korean organizational context by systematically translating the measurement questionnaires of ISA engagement proposed by Soane et al.(2012) and validating the scale, and to suggest implications. For this purpose, a sample of 393 employees in the chemical industry in Korea was collected, and the results of the validity analysis of the ISA engagement scale, which was examined through factor analysis, Rasch model, and measurement equivalence test, are as follows. First, as a result of dividing the sample and performing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, it was confirmed that the three-factor structure identical to the theoretical structure was appropriate. Second, the 9 items of the ISA engagement scale generally met the criterion of item validity of the Rasch model. Third, items of the ISA engagement scale were composed of easy questions with low difficulty overall, so it was confirmed that there was a need to improve or add questions to distinguish respondents who showed high characteristics. Fourth, As a result of the measurement equivalence test by group using demographic variables, there was no statistical difference in gender, but other group categories did not satisfy intercept equivalence. In addition, as a result of performing path analysis with job crafting and job satisfaction as each dependent variable, it was confirmed that there was a moderate effect size based on Cohen's d value. The significance of this study is that it provides a basis for utilizing Korean research by designing an ISA engagement scale that emphasizes the relational nature of ISA engagement in a social context and validates its validity in a domestic setting.