민법 218조와 급수조례의 수도시설권

The provisions on neighboring relationships regulations under 「Civil Act were not utilized, leaving their role to the regulation under public law. This paper aims to examine that Article 218 in the 「Civil Act」 has practical significance. To use the water supply, an application for water supply must be submitted to the local government, which requires the consent of the landowners through which the water pipes pass. If they do not submit their consent forms, the 「Supply and Waterworks Installation Act」etc., does not stipulate how to resolve the dispute and rejects the application for water supply. Meanwhile, Article 218 in the 「Civil Act」 considers the right to water supply a right naturally recognized by this regulation. Although the「Civil Act」and「Supply and Waterworks Installation Act」are laws with different regulatory phases, they apply to all parties in applying for water supply, so it is necessary to discuss how to interpret public law and private laws with different legislative purposes. We identify the inconveniences that the water supply applicant realistically experiences through actual cases, and on the premise of that, we look at the legal system related to the water supply industry and water supply. We will also look at the significance of Article 218 in the「Civil Act」 in relation to 「Supply and Waterworks Installation Act」, and what needs to be improved to resolve disputes related to water supply. In the end, neighboring relationships regulations in the「Civil Act」are laws that embody the content and limitations of land ownership, and it is worth discussing how to use them suitable for the modern era.