Analysis of the Recent Research Trends on Executive Compensation: Comparison between South Korea and China
Analysis of the Recent Research Trends on Executive Compensation: Comparison between South Korea and China
Dong Sirui(Department of Accounting and Taxation, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University); Jia Zhong(Department of Accounting and Taxation, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University); Jiyeon Lee(Department of Global Business Administration, Catholic University of Korea); Youn-Sik Choi(Department of Accounting and Taxation, School of Management, Kyung Hee University)
115호, 95~136쪽
초록
[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to analyze the similarities and differences in the role of executive compensation in business practice of Korea and China, in order to draw the foundation for evidence-based policy implications and identify a new area for future research. [Methodology] From 2000 to 2022, an analysis of literature published in the top six (five) accounting journals in South Korea (China) was conducted, and compare the major findings of them in various perspectives. [Findings] The research on executive compensation started earlier in South Korea than in China. The focus of the research on executive compensation differs between the two countries; the determinants of executive compensation vary between the two countries, and the proxies for firm performance are mostly the same in the two countries. However, most of the studies in the two countries document that executive compensation has a positive impact on firm performance. [Implications] The findings of this study imply that despite the variability in social structures and modes of economic development between South Korea and China, a universal recognition of the function of executive compensation systems within corporate settings emerges. This commonality underscores a shared perspective on the significance of executive remuneration in aligning the interests of management with those of the shareholders.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to analyze the similarities and differences in the role of executive compensation in business practice of Korea and China, in order to draw the foundation for evidence-based policy implications and identify a new area for future research. [Methodology] From 2000 to 2022, an analysis of literature published in the top six (five) accounting journals in South Korea (China) was conducted, and compare the major findings of them in various perspectives. [Findings] The research on executive compensation started earlier in South Korea than in China. The focus of the research on executive compensation differs between the two countries; the determinants of executive compensation vary between the two countries, and the proxies for firm performance are mostly the same in the two countries. However, most of the studies in the two countries document that executive compensation has a positive impact on firm performance. [Implications] The findings of this study imply that despite the variability in social structures and modes of economic development between South Korea and China, a universal recognition of the function of executive compensation systems within corporate settings emerges. This commonality underscores a shared perspective on the significance of executive remuneration in aligning the interests of management with those of the shareholders.
- 발행기관:
- 한국국제회계학회
- 분류:
- 기타사회과학일반