주택공급 주체에 따른 법제 및 시사점

Distinguishing each Main Agent that supplies housing means confirming the presence or absence of “the public nature.” Defining the concept of the public nature is not an easy problem regardless of history, society, or the East or the West. However, it is possible to focus on the “subjective public nature” in terms of housing supply. Housing supply requires a lot of capital and manpower. Therefore, most housing supplies are made through public institutions, private corporations, or real estate investment companies rather than individuals, and the subjects can be divided into the public and private sectors. Looking at our legal system, the public 「SPECIAL ACT ON PUBLIC HOUSING」 stipulates public institutions such as LH as the Housing Supply Main Agent, and the private 「HOUSING ACT」 stipulates Housing Construction Project Operators as the Housing Supply Main Agent. However, the public nature of each Housing Supply Main Agent is difficult to find in the inner side of economic interests such as speculative behavior of LH executives and employees, which have been social issues in recent years, high performance bonuses for union leaders in the process of housing redevelopment and reconstruction, and increased share of private implementation entities, and it is difficult to find the public nature as it is only aimed at profitability of individuals or groups. Therefore, we will look into the housing supply legislation again and find ways and contents to restore the public nature, and derive cooperation plans and implications for housing supply entities from the perspective of housing welfare.