정부 보증서 취급기관의 창업 기업평가시스템 개선 연구
A Study on Enhancing the Evaluation System for Start-Up Companies by Government Guarantee Funds Agencies
노윤수(전북대학교 일반대학원 융합기술경영학과(MOT)); 윤성준(전북대학교 일반대학원 융합기술경영학과(MOT)); Nadiah(전북대학교 일반대학원 융합기술경영학과(MOT)); 박남주(전북대학교 일반대학원 융합기술경영학과(MOT)); 배준수(전북대학교)
47권 2024호, 1~10쪽
초록
A survey was conducted among 145 technology-based companies that utilized the government-supported policy funding system to secure necessary funds after launching their businesses. The results of this survey were analyzed for satisfaction and importance using the SPSS statistical program and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Based on the findings, we identified directions for improving the start-up enterprise evaluation system by assessing which aspects of the current system are satisfactory, unsat isfactory, important, and unnecessarily evaluated. The satisfaction survey revealed that the evaluations conducted by primary counse lors in charge of credit assessments were generally deemed unsatisfactory. This dissatisfaction stems from the fact that the personal discretion of the primary counselors, independent of the start-up enterprise evaluation system, significantly influences whether guarantee are approved. This lack of fairness and equity is a critical area that requires improvement. Based on the results of this study, we anticipate that the start-up enterprise evaluation system will be enhanced to ensure fairness and reasonableness, ultimately providing timely practical benefits to start-up companies and contributing to an increased survival rate for these businesses.
Abstract
A survey was conducted among 145 technology-based companies that utilized the government-supported policy funding system to secure necessary funds after launching their businesses. The results of this survey were analyzed for satisfaction and importance using the SPSS statistical program and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Based on the findings, we identified directions for improving the start-up enterprise evaluation system by assessing which aspects of the current system are satisfactory, unsat isfactory, important, and unnecessarily evaluated. The satisfaction survey revealed that the evaluations conducted by primary counse lors in charge of credit assessments were generally deemed unsatisfactory. This dissatisfaction stems from the fact that the personal discretion of the primary counselors, independent of the start-up enterprise evaluation system, significantly influences whether guarantee are approved. This lack of fairness and equity is a critical area that requires improvement. Based on the results of this study, we anticipate that the start-up enterprise evaluation system will be enhanced to ensure fairness and reasonableness, ultimately providing timely practical benefits to start-up companies and contributing to an increased survival rate for these businesses.
- 발행기관:
- 한국산업경영시스템학회
- 분류:
- 산업공학