애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문한국수산과학회지2024.12 발행

클로렐라(Chlorella pyrenoidosa) 단백질 추출을 위한 친환경 추출법 탐색

Exploring Eco-friendly Methods for Protein Extraction from Chlorella pyrenoidosa

조경진(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 김민웅(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 김도균(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 한서진(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 강주홍(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 윤다현(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 최지선(국립부경대학교 식품공학과); 김영목(국립부경대학교 식품공학과)

57권 6호, 684~690쪽

초록

In this study, we investigated eco-friendly physical and enzymatic methods for extracting proteins from Chlorella pyrenoidosa via cell wall decomposition. The physical methods used were hot-water extraction (HW), sonication (S), and ultrasonication (US), whereas the enzymatic methods included two cell wall-decomposing enzymes (cellulase and viscozyme L) and three proteolytic enzymes (microbial protease, papain, and bromelain) at a 1% substrate concentration. The results showed that HW and S were unsuitable for extracting chlorella proteins because of their low protein extraction yields. Conversely, among the physical treatment methods, US showed the highest protein extraction yield of 16.78±0.47%. However, physical methods can cause protein denaturation due to temperature increases with extended treatment time. In enzymatic treatment, only microbial protease proved effective, achieving the highest protein extraction yield of 36.26±2.32% after 6 h of treatment. The use of mixed enzymes did not significantly improve the yield compared to treatment with microbial protease alone. This study suggests that microbial protease is an effective method for protein extraction from chlorella and highlights its potential for application in the food industry as foundational data.

Abstract

In this study, we investigated eco-friendly physical and enzymatic methods for extracting proteins from Chlorella pyrenoidosa via cell wall decomposition. The physical methods used were hot-water extraction (HW), sonication (S), and ultrasonication (US), whereas the enzymatic methods included two cell wall-decomposing enzymes (cellulase and viscozyme L) and three proteolytic enzymes (microbial protease, papain, and bromelain) at a 1% substrate concentration. The results showed that HW and S were unsuitable for extracting chlorella proteins because of their low protein extraction yields. Conversely, among the physical treatment methods, US showed the highest protein extraction yield of 16.78±0.47%. However, physical methods can cause protein denaturation due to temperature increases with extended treatment time. In enzymatic treatment, only microbial protease proved effective, achieving the highest protein extraction yield of 36.26±2.32% after 6 h of treatment. The use of mixed enzymes did not significantly improve the yield compared to treatment with microbial protease alone. This study suggests that microbial protease is an effective method for protein extraction from chlorella and highlights its potential for application in the food industry as foundational data.

발행기관:
한국수산과학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2024.0684
분류:
수산학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
클로렐라(Chlorella pyrenoidosa) 단백질 추출을 위한 친환경 추출법 탐색 | 한국수산과학회지 2024 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI