서울시 신속통합기획의 실효적 개선방안 연구 -공공재개발과의 비교를 통한 개선점을 중심으로-

After Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon, who was elected in a by-election in 2011, the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s housing policy changed from a full-scale demolition method to a preservation, management, and regeneration method, and a survey began with a new town and redevelopment exit strategy, and 391 areas were lifted in Seoul alone from 2011 to 2020. Since the “2025 Seoul Metropolitan City Basic Plan for Urban and Residential Environment Improvement” (2025 Basic Plan) created by the former mayor of Seoul, no cases have been designated as redevelopment zones. The 2025 Basic Plan made it difficult for the former mayor to designate a redevelopment zone, saying he would prevent reckless maintenance projects. The Moon Jae-in administration presented solutions for supplying new housing, such as redevelopment and reconstruction, three times in 2020: ‘5.6 Measures’, ‘8.4 Measures’, and ‘2.4 Measures’ in 2021. The policy that came out of these measures is ‘public re-development’. Public redevelopment is a policy to supply new apartments in the city center to revitalize redevelopment areas where projects are sluggish to supply housing to Seoul and large cities. However, was public redevelopment not activated and was not welcomed by the redevelopment site? Since public institutions are the main body of the maintenance project, there is a disadvantage that the opinions of local residents are not actively reflected. In fact, when LH mentioned its plan to deploy apartments mainly in small areas at LH’s business briefing session at some candidate sites selected for public re-development, residents protested the so-called “chickenhouse” apartments, leading to a move to withdraw their consent. Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon, who was elected in a by-election in 2021, can be said to have originated from the purpose of penetrating the way of the Seoul housing market, which is causing housing instability due to a lack of new housing supply due to the regulation of excessive maintenance projects by his former mayor Park Won-soon. In addition, in areas complaining about the government’s public re-development method, residents want to change to private-led maintenance projects in the form of “fast integration planning” or “Moatown.” In particular, “fast integrated planning” can be said to be a method in which residents (unions) and the public work together to weave complex maintenance project processes into integrated planning. Therefore, the name “public planning” was initially used, but the name was changed to resolve confusion in terms of public-led maintenance projects such as “public re-development” and “public reconstruction.” In other words, the purpose of the original system, in which the subject of the project is the private sector and the public ‘support’, was clearly defined. The current mayor of Seoul also emphasized that “fast integration planning is not a conventional top-down administration, but that the Seoul Metropolitan Government supports planning and licensing procedures as a facilitator of private development projects.” On the other hand, the legal name of the rapid integration plan was set as the maintenance support plan. In other words, rapid integration planning is a superficial brand. Therefore, this study aims to supplement the shortcomings compared to public re-development to see if there are any shortcomings that can appear in the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s “quick integration plan,” promote the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s housing supply as a correct policy, and contribute to making it easier for Seoul citizens to find homes in new apartments.