애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문기업법연구2024.12 발행

Future of the Enforcement of Financial Disclosure Systems - Proposing the Possibility of Developing an Automated Script to Collect Cases Including Material Misstatements -

Future of the Enforcement of Financial Disclosure Systems - Proposing the Possibility of Developing an Automated Script to Collect Cases Including Material Misstatements -

Munehisa Wada(School of Commerce at Waseda University)

38권 4호, 127~141쪽

초록

This article examines the current challenges and prospects of enforcing Financial disclosure systems under the Securities Regulation, including the liability system in the Japanese Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, by focusing on identifying and measuring “material misstatements in the cases of misstatements. Traditionally, whether a false or fraudulent disclosure is “material” has been evaluated subjectively, relying on general investor perspectives and qualitative judgments in Japan. This approach, however, often proves insufficient and inappropriate, as it neither guarantees objectivity nor establishes the necessary standards for enforcing liability systems. Drawing on prominent cases in Japan, including the Seibu Railway, Toshiba, and Nissan cases, I would like to highlight that revelations of misstatements often correlate with significant drops in share prices. While these price changes suggest that material misstatements can be detected by their impact on investor decisions, isolating and measuring their influence remains complex. Corporate governance issues, long-term reputational damage, and broader market conditions can all affect share prices, complicating the objective identification of material misstatements. The article proposes developing an automated, AI-based data collection system to address these challenges. This approach entails using scripts, natural language processing, and financial data APIs to identify potential “signals” of material misstatements from public filings, such as the U.S. Form 8-K disclosures, and then linking these signals to significant share price fluctuations. Initial testing of such scripts has already produced promising candidates, though much refinement is needed. Improved filtering criteria, broader data sources, and more sophisticated analytical techniques are necessary for achieving statistically meaningful results. Finally, this article suggests that leveraging AI-driven, data-centric methodologies can lead to a more objective, reliable, and transparent enforcement framework for disclosure regulations. If I could develop these advancements, they could contribute significantly to the administrative enforcement regime and ultimately serve as a valuable tool for regulators, investors, and researchers in ensuring fair and trustworthy financial markets.

Abstract

This article examines the current challenges and prospects of enforcing Financial disclosure systems under the Securities Regulation, including the liability system in the Japanese Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, by focusing on identifying and measuring “material misstatements in the cases of misstatements. Traditionally, whether a false or fraudulent disclosure is “material” has been evaluated subjectively, relying on general investor perspectives and qualitative judgments in Japan. This approach, however, often proves insufficient and inappropriate, as it neither guarantees objectivity nor establishes the necessary standards for enforcing liability systems. Drawing on prominent cases in Japan, including the Seibu Railway, Toshiba, and Nissan cases, I would like to highlight that revelations of misstatements often correlate with significant drops in share prices. While these price changes suggest that material misstatements can be detected by their impact on investor decisions, isolating and measuring their influence remains complex. Corporate governance issues, long-term reputational damage, and broader market conditions can all affect share prices, complicating the objective identification of material misstatements. The article proposes developing an automated, AI-based data collection system to address these challenges. This approach entails using scripts, natural language processing, and financial data APIs to identify potential “signals” of material misstatements from public filings, such as the U.S. Form 8-K disclosures, and then linking these signals to significant share price fluctuations. Initial testing of such scripts has already produced promising candidates, though much refinement is needed. Improved filtering criteria, broader data sources, and more sophisticated analytical techniques are necessary for achieving statistically meaningful results. Finally, this article suggests that leveraging AI-driven, data-centric methodologies can lead to a more objective, reliable, and transparent enforcement framework for disclosure regulations. If I could develop these advancements, they could contribute significantly to the administrative enforcement regime and ultimately serve as a valuable tool for regulators, investors, and researchers in ensuring fair and trustworthy financial markets.

발행기관:
한국기업법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.24886/BLR.2024.12.38.4.127
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Future of the Enforcement of Financial Disclosure Systems - Proposing the Possibility of Developing an Automated Script to Collect Cases Including Material Misstatements - | 기업법연구 2024 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI