직장 내 괴롭힘 금지 관련 광역자치단체 조례 분석 연구

This study analyzes the ordinances of metropolitan municipalities that stipulate the prohibition of workplace bullying, identifying structural and substantive shortcomings. To this end, a content analysis method was applied to 9 ordinances collected through the Local Legislation Information System. The analysis revealed that while elements related to normative validity were generally present in the ordinances, fulfilling the formal requirements of the law, there were significant differences in substantive content. Based on these findings, the study proposed amendments to ordinances addressing issues such as the scope of application, prohibited acts, the obligations of municipal leaders, and the rights of residents. Additionally, it was emphasized that for projects outlined in the ordinances, amendments should reflect regional characteristics, clarify the responsibilities of municipal leaders, and specify the implementation of project details, including the enactment of enforcement rules. The study also highlighted the necessity of including provisions that explicitly address remedies for harm and the recovery of victims. In terms of the effectiveness of the ordinances, the study called for amendments that concretely specify the responsibilities of municipal leaders concerning organizational and personnel matters and enhance professionalism. It also criticized the absence of provisions related to rights protection in connection with the regulations on residents' rights. Based on these findings, the study proposed revising ordinances and labor laws to explicitly state the national responsibility for providing a safe working environment and expanding the scope of legal application. Furthermore, it argued for the inclusion of provisions that enable substantive recovery of harm and victim rehabilitation not only in related ordinances but also in higher-level laws.