애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법학논총2024.12 발행

数字弱势群体权利立法保护问题研究

Research on the Legislation Protection of Digital Vulnerable Groups' Rights

于君燕(중국 산동 众成清泰(城陽)법률사무소); 阴秀王(北京大成(太原)律师事务所)

48권 4호, 3~24쪽

초록

数字弱势群体,指的是在数字时代中,因经济贫困、能力有限以及数字科技的迅猛发展、信息传播的不均衡和数字经济的固有弊端等多重因素,导致其在获取数字资源、享受数字红利及保障法律权利方面明显处于劣势的群体。数字弱势群体权利保护是保护人格尊严与满足个人自由发展的客观需要,是建设数字法治国家的重要内容,是实现社会公平正义的具体要求,与每个人的数字化生存有着紧密的联系。 随着数字技术社会化进程的不断推进,“难以理解、难以接受”已经变成数字弱势群体对于智慧社会最直接的认识。从数字技术发展历程来看,其给人类生活带来极大便利的同时也引发了诸多社会矛盾与冲突,就立法保护而言:部分规则需要更加完善、权利内容以及权利保护的义务主体及其内容都需要进一步加以明确等。究其原因,随着数字技术在现代社会的不断深入,法律对数字技术的更新的速度已呈现出滞后性;分散型立法保护模式在其应用的广度和保护策略上都存在一定的限制;社会各部门对数字弱势群体保护责任意识欠缺等原因导致难以有效应对数字弱势群体这个特殊问题。需要强调的是,数字化的转型正在全球范围内掀起一场革命,数字弱势群体的权利保护也是其他国家普遍面临的问题。欧盟在此方面采取了统一式立法保护模式,美国采取了分散式立法保护模式。因此在数字弱势群体权利保护方面,可以借鉴欧美发达国家的实践经验,为数字弱势群体权利立法保护构建一个更加完善的权利保护体系。具体而言,首先在立法模式上:实行统一与分散相结合的立法模式,通过统一立法为数字弱势群体权利保护提供统一的法律依据,并在各个单行法中进一步完善相关规定,以确保数字弱势群体的权利得到充分实现。其次在立法内容上:第一,建立以防止损害权为核心的“知情-同意-否决”框架;第二,完善数字弱势群体权利保护规则体系;第三,明确数字弱势群体权利保护的义务主体及其内容,以确保数字弱势群体在数字化时代能够实现其权利。

Abstract

The "digitally vulnerable group" refers to those who are disadvantaged in accessing digital resources, enjoying digital dividends, and safeguarding legal rights due to multiple factors such as economic poverty, limited capabilities, the rapid development of digital technology, unbalanced information dissemination, and inherent disadvantages of the digital economy in the digital era. Their characteristics are reflected in the broad scope of the subject, the uniqueness of judgment criteria, and the vulnerability of their rights. The protection of the rights of the digitally vulnerable group is an objective necessity for protecting personal dignity and satisfying the free development of individuals. It is an important part of building a country with digital rule of law, a specific requirement for achieving social fairness and justice, and is closely related to everyone's digital existence. With the continuous advancement of the socialization of digital technology, "difficult to understand and difficult to accept" has become the most direct understanding of the intelligent society among the digitally vulnerable groups. Although digital technology has brought great convenience to human life, it has also triggered many social contradictions and conflicts. China's relevant laws have made certain revisions and adjustments. However, in terms of legislative protection, there are still some dilemmas: some rules need to be further improved, and the content of rights, as well as the subjects and their content of the obligation to protect rights, need to be further clarified. The reasons for this are the lagging speed of legal updates to digital technology as digital technology continues to penetrate modern society; the limitations of the dispersed legislative protection model in terms of its breadth of application and protection strategies; and the lack of awareness among various social sectors of their responsibility to protect the digitally vulnerable group, making it difficult to effectively address this particular issue. It is important to emphasize that the digital transformation is revolutionizing the world, and the protection of the rights of the digitally vulnerable group is a common problem faced by other countries as well. The European Union has adopted a unified legislative protection model in this regard, while the United States has adopted a decentralized legislative protection model. China can learn from the practical experience of developed countries in Europe and the United States and, combined with its specific situation, build a more comprehensive rights protection system for the legislative protection of the rights of the digitally vulnerable group. Specifically, first, in terms of the legislative model: a combination of unified and decentralized legislative models should be implemented. Unified legislation should provide a unified legal basis for the protection of the rights of the digitally vulnerable group, and further improve relevant provisions in individual laws to ensure that the rights of the digitally vulnerable group are fully realized. Second, in terms of legislative content: firstly, establish a framework of "inform-consent-veto" centered on preventing harm to rights; secondly, improve the rule system for protecting the rights of the digitally vulnerable group; thirdly, clarify the subjects and their content of the obligation to protect the rights of the digitally vulnerable group to ensure that they can realize their rights in the digital era.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
数字弱势群体权利立法保护问题研究 | 법학논총 2024 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI