电信网络诈骗犯罪的司法认定研究
A Study on Judicial Recognition of Telecommunication Network Fraud Crimes
刘璐(庆尚国立大学校法科大学); 李佳童(山东工商学院)
48권 4호, 55~83쪽
초록
电信网络诈骗犯罪是一种融合传统诈骗手法和现代计算机网络技术的新型网络犯罪,这种犯罪给社会发展、公众和私人财产安全、个人信息保护以及网络环境的秩序带来了重大影响。在中国,由于刑法中缺乏对电信网络诈骗罪规定的具体条款,而司法实践中往往依赖相关的司法解释和刑事政策来作为判决依据,这就给司法人员在确定电信网络诈骗的性质和适用法律方面提出了难题。 通过对电信网络诈骗犯罪基础理论框架的了解,以及对在不断发展的信息技术背景下呈现的新趋势和特点进行讨论,通过细致分析其组织结构、作案模式及分工机制,来揭示这类犯罪的复杂性和多变性。利用中国裁判文书网、无讼网等法律信息检索系统,对大量具体案例进行了深入分析总结出司法认定中的难点,同时结合实例和现有学术理论,细致探讨了在处理电信网络诈骗犯罪过程中出现的主要司法认定难题及亟待解决的关键问题:与其他罪名的区分、既遂与未遂犯罪数额的确定标准以及主从犯应如何认定。 在深入研究相关文献和解析立法意图的基础上,遵循罪责刑相适应的基本刑法原则,提出了切实可行的建议,包括坚持处分意识不要说的观点来区分诈骗罪与盗窃罪;区分诈骗罪共犯与帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪时从明知可能与明知必然程度标准把握;坚持实际控制说作为认定诈骗罪既遂的标准以及分析诈骗数额不足时是否成立诈骗罪未遂的问题,并提出确定主从犯要基于全案事实进行判定的建议。本文在对这些关键问题深度分析的基础上提出了相应的完善建议,以期为电信网络诈骗犯罪的有效司法处理和理论研究提供坚实的支持,为提高司法效率和准确性提供具体且实用的建议。
Abstract
Telecom network fraud combines traditional fraud methods and modern computer network technology to form a new type of cybercrime. This crime has a significant impact on the development of society, the security of public and private property, the protection of personal information, and the order of the cyber environment. In China, due to the lack of specific provisions on the crime of telecommunication network fraud in the Criminal Law, judicial practice often relies on relevant judicial interpretations and criminal policies as the basis for judgment. This situation makes it law. Therefore, through extensive reading of academic articles and professional works, the first part of this article focuses on introducing the basic theoretical framework of telecommunications network fraud crimes, emphasizing the urgency and importance of research in this field, aiming to provide readers with a comprehensive theoretical background. And ensure the overall coherence of the paper. The article further deepens the discussion on the basic theory, core characteristics, and new trends and characteristics of telecommunications network fraud crimes in the context of constantly developing information technology. It analyzes in detail its organizational structure, crime mode, and division of labor mechanism to reveal the complexity and variability of such crimes. Secondly, a large number of specific cases were analyzed in depth using legal information retrieval systems such as the Judgment Document Network and the Non Litigation Network. By analyzing 16150 legal documents since 2017, this article reveals the regional characteristics of telecommunications network fraud cases, selects typical cases to explore the difficulties in judicial determination, and combines examples and existing academic theories to carefully explore the main judicial determination difficulties and key issues that need to be solved in dealing with telecommunications network fraud crimes, such as distinguishing from other charges, determining the amount of completed and attempted crimes, and how to determine the master-slave offenders. Therefore, based on in-depth research of relevant literature and analysis of legislative intentions, this article follows the basic principles of criminal law that are suitable for criminal responsibility and punishment, and puts forward practical and feasible suggestions, including adhering to the perspective of disciplinary awareness not to mention to distinguish between fraud and theft, accomplices of fraud and crimes of aiding information network activities, and grasping the standard of knowing the possibility and knowing the necessity when distinguishing; Adhere to the theory of actual control as the standard for determining the completion of fraud, analyze the issue of whether the attempted fraud is established when the amount of fraud is insufficient, and propose suggestions that determining the master-slave offender should be based on the facts of the entire case. Through in-depth analysis of these key issues and the proposal of suggestions, the goal of this article is to provide solid support for the effective judicial handling and theoretical research of telecommunications network fraud crimes, and to provide specific and practical suggestions for improving judicial efficiency and accuracy.
- 발행기관:
- 법학연구소
- 분류:
- 법학