교육전문대학원 도입에 대한 비판적 고찰: 법학전문대학원과 의학전문대학원 사례를 중심으로

This study examines the possible structural limitations and constraints of the introduction of Specialized Graduate Schools of Education (SGSEs), which have been proposed as an alternative to the current teacher training system. To this end, it conducted a comparative analysis with Law Schools and Medical Schools. Law Schools successfully replaced the traditional judicial examination system and became institutionalized; however, the bar exam’s role as a de facto selection test shifted legal education toward exam-oriented training, weakening foundational legal studies. In contrast, Medical Schools were introduced as an alternative to existing medical colleges but operated in parallel, leading to disruptions in the academic system and failing to fulfill their intended role of fostering medical scientists. As a result, most universities ultimately reverted back to the traditional medical education model. This study utilized three analytical frameworks: the establishment and implementation process, post-graduation career pathways and qualification exams, and the structural organization of the academic system. Moreover, potential operational issues for SGSEs were explored. The findings highlighted key concerns such as fostering internal consensus, securing legal and institutional foundations, ensuring career stability for graduates, and defining a clear structural relationship with existing Universities and Colleges of Education. This study argues that Unless these issues are effectively addressed, SGSEs may fail to resolve the limitations of the current teacher training system and instead risk introducing new problems. Thus, a cautious approach is required, drawing on lessons from the experiences of Law Schools and Medical Schools.