태아의 사망을 임부에 대한 상해로 볼 수 있는가
Can the death of a fetus resulting from an assault be considered an injury to a pregnant woman?
이성민(서울대학교 법학연구소)
36권 1호, 161~191쪽
초록
최근 가정폭력・교제폭력 상황에서 임신한 여성이 구타당하여 태아를 유산한 경우 태아의 사망이 상해로 인정되지 않는 경향이 있는데, 이 논문은 이러한 결론이 합당한지 의문을 제기하고자 하였다. 이에 형법 제257조의 상해 개념 내에서 임부의 신체에 불법적으로 가해진 손상에 의한 태아의 유산은 임부의 생리적 기능에 대한 훼손 내지 건강상태의 불량한 변경에 해당함을 논증하고자, 간강치상죄에 있어 원하지 않은 임신이 상해가 되는 문제와 부동의낙태죄에 있어 원하는 임신의중절이 임부에 대한 상해가 되는 문제를 비교하여 논하였다. 결론적으로 낙태죄로 규율되지 않는 행위로 인하여 태아가 사망한 경우 그 유산 자체를 임부에 대한 상해로 의율할 수 있어야 한다고 보았다. 임신한 여성의 몸은 자연스럽게 태아를 양육・출산하기 위한 생리적 기능을 발현하고 그에 따라 상당한 건강상태의 변화가 수반되는 것이 보편적인데, 이러한 과정을 폭력적으로 중단・파괴함으로써 태아를 유산시키는 행위는 임부의 승낙으로 행한 낙태행위에 필연적으로 수반되는 상해와 동일한 맥락에서 평가할 수는 없기 때문이다. 임부의 신체는 임신하지 않은 상태보다 외부의 공격에 취약한 상태이며, 특히 가족과 같이 친밀한 관계 내에서 임신과 출산은 더욱 중대한 보호가치를 갖는 바, 임부의 신체적・정신적 안정을 위협하는 폭력범죄는 중대한 범죄로 예방할 필요성이 상당하다. 또 예외적으로 낙태죄에서 임부와 독립한 법익주체로서 복중 태아의 생명권을 보장한 것과 달리, 폭행・상해죄에서 태아와 임부는 유기적으로 연결되어 있으며 태아의 사망은 동시에 임부의신체에 대한 손상을 의미한다고 보았다. 나아가 피해자가 태아의 유산을 제외한 다른 상해를 주장하지 않고서는 현행법상 폭행치상죄, 부동의낙태치상죄로 처벌할 수 없는 공백이 있으며, 낙태치상・폭행치상죄의 법정형에 불규형 문제도 심각함을 지적하였다.
Abstract
Historically, our academic community has developed various legal and interpretive theories regarding ① whether pregnancy resulting from rape constitutes bodily injury and ② whether medical procedures performed to remove a fetus that has died due to medical malpractice constitute professional negligence resulting in bodily injury. In rape cases, most case law and academic theories have excluded rape-related-pregnancy from the category of bodily injury, viewing it as a natural manifestation of a woman's physiological functions (see Supreme Court decisions 2019.4.17. 2018Do17410; 2019.5.10. 2019Do834). Similarly, when assessing injuries resulting from professional negligence during/after the labor or abortion, our criminal law does not interpret the fetus as part of the pregnant woman's body, nor does it consider unwanted abortion as a violation of the woman’s physiological functions of nurturing and giving birth to the fetus, which would constitute bodily injury to the woman. Therefore, acts that result in the death of the fetus considered to be an impairment of the woman’s physiological functions or a detrimental change in her state of health which constitutes an injury to a person’s body (see Supreme Court decision 2007.6.29. 2005Do3832). In addition, recent lower court cases have considered whether assault charges apply when a pregnant woman is assaulted in situations of domestic or dating violence, resulting in a miscarriage. However, these cases have largely reiterated the above legal principles, leading to the conclusion that both pregnancy and miscarriage resulting from violent crimes are not recognized as bodily injury to the woman. This paper questions the appropriateness of this conclusion and aims to demonstrate that miscarriage caused by unlawful injury to a pregnant woman's body constitutes an impairment of her physiological functions or a detrimental change in her state of health, thereby encompassing miscarriage as bodily injury to a woman under the crime of bodily injury(Criminal Code Article 257). To this end, the paper first examines the position of the pregnant woman and the fetus within the framework of the crime of bodily injury and analyzes case law and academic theories on whether pregnancy constitutes bodily injury in the context of rape-related pregnancy (Ⅱ). It then compares case law and academic theories on whether the death of a fetus constitutes injury to the pregnant woman in cases of professional negligence resulting in or injury resulting from unwanted abortion(III). Through this analysis, the paper concludes, first, that in cases of abortions performed without the woman's consent, especially when the miscarriage is caused by the violence, such acts cannot be evaluated in the same context as the injuries that inevitably accompany from abortions performed with the woman's consent. Second, unlike the exceptional protection of the right to life of the fetus as an independent legal interest in abortion provisions, in the context of assault and battery crimes the fetus and the pregnant woman are organically connected, and the death of the fetus simultaneously means harm to the woman's body. In particular, the body of a pregnant woman is more vulnerable to external attack than that of a non-pregnant person. In intimate relationships, pregnancy and childbirth have a great protective value, so it is imperative to prevent violent crimes against pregnant women. Historically, during the Joseon Dynasty, there were provisions for severe punishment for assaulting a pregnant woman. In modern times, however, there is a loophole in the law that makes it difficult to prosecute assault and battery (Article 262) and injuries resulting from non-consensual abortions (Criminal Law Article 270, Paragraph 3) unless the victim claims injuries other than miscarriage. In addition, the disparity in legal penalties between injury resulting from abortion and assault resulting in injury is a serious problem. Since the body of a pregnant woman not only naturally undergoes physiological functions for the nourishment and birth of the fetus but is also accompanied by significant changes in health status, acts that violently interrupt and destroy this process, causing miscarriage, can be understood as impairment of physiological functions leading to post-pregnancy nourishment and childbirth, and as harmful changes in health status. Consequently, in cases where the fetus dies as a result of acts not regulated by the provisions on illegal abortion, the miscarriage itself shall be considered a bodily injury to the pregnant woman.
- 발행기관:
- 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 분류:
- 법학