규범의 정당성 검토를 위한 사회과 입법교육 수업모형 제안

This study proposes an instructional model for legislative education centered on the process of evaluating the legitimacy of legal norms. To this end, it identifies three key orientations of legislative education: integrated political and legal education, constructivist learning that embraces disagreement, and competency-based education for democratic citizenship. Through a critical review of existing legislative education models, the study highlights the need to shift the focus from the experience of norm formation to that of examining normative legitimacy. Drawing on the procedures and logical structure of constitutional adjudication, the study sets a direction for instructional design. As principles of content design, the model proposes selecting constitutional issues as the object of examination, employing constitutional values and principles of judgment as criteria, and expressing the examination process and outcomes in argumentative form. In terms of methodological design, the study suggests applying legal syllogism through narrative cases, combining the social studies decision-making model with the principle of proportionality, and using the format of Constitutional Court decisions for student writing. The model, as ultimately proposed, consists of six-stage: identifying legal issues, understanding the law, analyzing the law, examining it critically, writing conclusions as a group, and linking leaning to practical civic engagement.