애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문외법논집2025.05 발행

Henry David Thoreau and Freedom of Conscience; History, Analysis, Critique and Modern Implications

Henry David Thoreau and Freedom of Conscience; History, Analysis, Critique and Modern Implications

Lee, Seung Uk(Korea University Law School, Fellow Professor)

49권 2호, 97~122쪽

초록

Henry David Thoreau is globally renowned for his conceptualization of civil disobedience; consequently, the academic narrative regarding Thoreau is heavily focused on the concept. In contrast to the general trend, this article aims to shed light on the less attended yet underlying aspect of Thoreau’s philosophy – on freedom of conscience. This article first investigates the historical development of freedom of conscience. Then, it shall specifically analyze parts of Thoreau’s works that bear resemblance to (freedom of) conscience. The next chapter shall critique the modern constitutional case on conscientious objection with the standards from analysis of Thoreau’s works. The final part will conclude with modern implications of Thoreau’s works on conscience. Through this progressive process, this article wishes to contribute to expanding our scope of knowledge on both Thoreau’s works and freedom of conscience. To conclude, Thoreau’s multilayered views coincide with freedom of conscience in three aspects. At the individual level, his conviction of inviolability of conscience is relevant to freedom of belief or thought, which is a passive aspect of conscience. Further, his repudiation to governmental moral turpitude is relevant to freedom of practice, which is an active aspect of conscience. Lastly, he envisioned a government led by conscience, illustrating freedom of conscience as the state’s guiding principle - an aspect of conscience elevated to the national level. The Constitutional Court’s case does not satisfy Thoreau’s standards in multiple aspects. Thoreau’s arguments on conscience serve as a powerful tool for reexamining the balance between state control and individual freedom, advocating for stronger protections of individual conscience and autonomy. They can empower civil movements and reshape public opinion in favor of individual liberty, potentially leading to a restructuring of how courts balance legal precedents with ethical concerns. Ultimately, these impacts may amount to limiting governmental interventions in individuals’ lives. Therefore, Thoreau’s views on conscience remain profoundly significant for protecting individual liberty in modern society.

Abstract

Henry David Thoreau is globally renowned for his conceptualization of civil disobedience; consequently, the academic narrative regarding Thoreau is heavily focused on the concept. In contrast to the general trend, this article aims to shed light on the less attended yet underlying aspect of Thoreau’s philosophy – on freedom of conscience. This article first investigates the historical development of freedom of conscience. Then, it shall specifically analyze parts of Thoreau’s works that bear resemblance to (freedom of) conscience. The next chapter shall critique the modern constitutional case on conscientious objection with the standards from analysis of Thoreau’s works. The final part will conclude with modern implications of Thoreau’s works on conscience. Through this progressive process, this article wishes to contribute to expanding our scope of knowledge on both Thoreau’s works and freedom of conscience. To conclude, Thoreau’s multilayered views coincide with freedom of conscience in three aspects. At the individual level, his conviction of inviolability of conscience is relevant to freedom of belief or thought, which is a passive aspect of conscience. Further, his repudiation to governmental moral turpitude is relevant to freedom of practice, which is an active aspect of conscience. Lastly, he envisioned a government led by conscience, illustrating freedom of conscience as the state’s guiding principle - an aspect of conscience elevated to the national level. The Constitutional Court’s case does not satisfy Thoreau’s standards in multiple aspects. Thoreau’s arguments on conscience serve as a powerful tool for reexamining the balance between state control and individual freedom, advocating for stronger protections of individual conscience and autonomy. They can empower civil movements and reshape public opinion in favor of individual liberty, potentially leading to a restructuring of how courts balance legal precedents with ethical concerns. Ultimately, these impacts may amount to limiting governmental interventions in individuals’ lives. Therefore, Thoreau’s views on conscience remain profoundly significant for protecting individual liberty in modern society.

발행기관:
법학연구소
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17257/hufslr.2025.49.2.97
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Henry David Thoreau and Freedom of Conscience; History, Analysis, Critique and Modern Implications | 외법논집 2025 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI