애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법학연구2025.07 발행

国际刑事法院管辖权行使的风险挑战与应对路径研究

Analyzing the Risks and Challenges of the Exercise of the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the Path to Responding to Them

원바오빈(동아대학교); 리우춘샤오(동아대학교)

33권 3호, 19~48쪽

초록

本文深入探讨了国际刑事法院管辖权行使的风险挑战与应对路径,分析了国际刑事法院管辖权的法律基础、成立历程、范围与限制、行使方式、争议问题,以及未来发展方向。通过对《国际刑事法院罗马规约》的解读,本文揭示了国际刑事法院管辖权的法律属性与核心要素,强调国际刑事法院行使管辖权时应当恪守“尊重国家主权原则”、“不干涉内政原则”、“刑法谦抑性原则”、“罪刑法定原则”等国际法和刑法普遍遵循的原则和规则;不得随意擅自扩权,避免沦落为某些强权政治干预他国内政的“工具”,秉持管辖权行使全过程的合法性、正当性、独立性、公正性。 通过对国际刑事法院管辖的部分典型案例分析,揭露国际刑事法院管辖权行使中存在的不足之处,有些案件审判时间过长,达到十几二十年,既不利于嫌疑人合法权益的保护,也不利于彰显国际刑事法院在“惩罚最严重犯罪”中的效果作用。国际刑事法院应当明确规定审判时限,明确规定嫌疑人被羁押时限和次数,不得在判决有罪之前变相实行“终生监禁”。探讨了国际刑事法院管辖权行使的触发机制、运行机制存在的风险问题。国际刑事法院应当完善自身适用法律体系,制定“积极的补充性管辖政策”,积极推动《犯罪条件》修正案的制定,细化《犯罪条件》的具体规定,明确管辖权的范围和行使条件;加快《程序和证据规则》等操作规程新时代化修订,优化《程序和证据规则》中的“初步审查”、“正式调查”、“证据采集与审查”、“逮捕令的签发与执行”、“嫌疑人的羁押与安全保护”、“嫌疑人辩护权保护”、“证据在审查起诉的认定程序”、“证据在审判中质证与认定程序”等等,增强其可操作性和适应性。 本文特别强调新时代科学技术运用对国际刑事法院的未来发展的作用。完善国际刑事法院证据采集技术、可以利用区块链技术,确保证据的真实性和完整性,增强证据的可信度;可以利用大数据分析技术和人工智能技术,快速筛选和分析海量信息,可以利用线上询问(讯问)留存技术、庭审技术和法律文书电子送达留存技术等新时代科学技术,节约审判资源,提高调查、审查、审判效率。同时,加强国际合作,提高国际刑事法院管辖权认可度,争取主权国家有效支持,以期实现案件效果、法律效果和社会效果的提升等建议,以期为国际刑事法院的未来发展提供参考。

Abstract

This paper discusses in depth the risks and challenges in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the path of response, and analyzes the legal basis of the jurisdiction of the ICC, the history of its establishment, its scope and limitations, the ways of exercising it, the controversial issues and the direction of its future development. Through the interpretation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, this paper reveals the legal attributes and core elements of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, and emphasizes that the International Criminal Court, in exercising its jurisdiction, should abide by the principles of "respect for national sovereignty", "non-interference in internal affairs", "moderation of criminal law", "non-interference in internal affairs" and "moderation of criminal law". It emphasizes that the International Criminal Court, in exercising its jurisdiction, should abide by the principles and rules of international law and criminal law such as "respect for national sovereignty", "non-interference in internal affairs", "principle of modesty in criminal law" and "principle of legality of crimes and penalties", etc.; it should not arbitrarily expand its powers to avoid becoming a "tool" for certain power politics to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. "It should uphold the legality, legitimacy, independence and impartiality of the entire process of exercising jurisdiction. Through the analysis of some typical cases under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC), this paper exposes the deficiencies in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the ICC, and the excessive length of some trials, which has reached more than 10 to 20 years, which is not conducive to the protection of the lawful rights and interests of suspects, nor is it conducive to the demonstration of the effectiveness of the ICC in "punishing the most serious crimes". The International Criminal Court should clearly define the time limits for trials. The International Criminal Court should clearly define the time limits for trials, the time limits and the number of times suspects are to be detained, and should not impose "life imprisonment" before a verdict of guilty is reached. The triggering mechanism for the exercise of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the risks involved in its operation are explored. The ICC should improve its own applicable legal system, formulate a "positive complementary jurisdiction policy", actively promote the formulation of amendments to the Conditions of Crimes, refine the specific provisions of the Conditions of Crimes, and clarify the scope and conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction; accelerate the revision of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence and other operating rules in the new era, and optimize the scope and conditions of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. Rules of Procedure and Evidence, optimize the "preliminary examination", "formal investigation", "collection and examination of evidence", "issuance and execution of arrest warrants", "arrest of suspects", "arrest of suspects", "arrest of suspects", and "arrest of suspects". In the "Preliminary Examination", "Formal Investigation", "Collection and Examination of Evidence", "Issuance and Execution of Arrest Warrant", "Custody and Safe Protection of Suspects", "Protection of Suspects' Right to Defense", and "Procedures for the Determination of Evidence in the Examination and Prosecution", "Procedures for the examination and determination of evidence at trial", etc., to enhance their operability and adaptability. This paper particularly emphasizes the role of the use of science and technology in the new era for the future development of the International Criminal Court. To improve the evidence collection technology of the ICC, blockchain technology can be utilized to ensure the authenticity and integrity of the evidence and enhance the credibility of the evidence; big data analysis technology and artificial intelligence technology can be utilized to quickly screen and analyze massive amounts of information, and new-age science and technology, such as online questioning (interrogation) retention technology, courtroom trial technology, and legal document electronic service retention technology, can be utilized to economize on trial resources and improve the efficiency of investigation, examination, and trial. investigation, examination and trial efficiency. At the same time, recommendations such as strengthening international cooperation, enhancing the recognition of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, and seeking the effective support of sovereign States with a view to realizing the enhancement of the effectiveness of cases, the legal effect and the social effect are made with a view to providing a reference for the future development of the International Criminal Court.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
기초법

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작