보조생식을 이용할 권리에 대한 유럽인권재판소의 S.H. and Others v. Austria 판결

The judgment of ECHR responds negatively the appeal on the part of four Austrian citizens (two married couples) against the Austrian state. The applicants complained that the prohibition of sperm and ova donation for in vitro fertilisation as established in the Austrian Law of 1992 amounts to discrimination, against article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights in conjunction with article 8, which establishes that everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life. In addition, the Grand Chamber added that even if it ruled that there was no violation of Article 8, the contracting states should continue to monitor the development of laws in this area, which is particularly rapidly developing in the fields of science and law. In this regard, it is evaluated that this ruling had a significant impact on legislation on assisted reproduction in European countries, and Austria subsequently completed advanced legislation on the right to use assisted reproduction. This includes recognizing the right to use assisted reproduction in female-female same-sex relationships and establishing regulations for establishing the parent-child relationship of children born through this. The implications of this ruling for the direction of assisted reproduction legislation in Korea are summarized as follows. Considering that the development stage of assisted reproductive technology has reached a certain level of uniformity worldwide, it would be sufficient to regulate it in a similar way to the scope of assisted reproductive technology generally accepted in the European countries mentioned above. For some types, it would be necessary to consider allowing it under the premise of excluding commercial transactions under strict requirements (e.g., the surrogate mother must be unmarried, the surrogate mother's husband must consent, the surrogate mother must have childbirth experience, etc.). Regulations on the parent-child relationship of children born through assisted reproductive technology must be established. When establishing criteria for determining parent-child relationship of children born through assisted reproductive technology, the best interests of the child must be given top priority.