애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문리스크관리연구2025.09 발행

Signaling in the Supply Chain: Can Climate Risk Disclosure Mitigate the Bullwhip Effect? Evidence from China

Signaling in the Supply Chain: Can Climate Risk Disclosure Mitigate the Bullwhip Effect? Evidence from China

Han Sun(Hanyang University); 강형구(한양대학교); Geng Huang(Sungkyunkwan University); Jae Ho Lee(Hanyang University)

36권 3호, 1~27쪽

초록

This study explores the operational impact of non-financial disclosure, specifically whether corporate climate risk disclosure (CRD) helps mitigate the bullwhip effect (BWE) in supply chains. Grounded in signaling and stakeholder theories, the authors propose that high-quality CRD reduces inter-firm information asymmetry and signals stronger operational resilience, thereby dampening demand variability. Analyzing data from Chinese A-share listed manufacturing firms between 2013 and 2022, the study finds a significant negative relationship between CRD quality and the magnitude of the BWE. This effect is stronger in firms with better corporate governance. To address potential endogeneity, the study uses a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach based on the 2018 revision of China’s corporate governance guidelines and a two-stage least squares (2SLS) method. Results remain robust, highlighting CRD’s role in enhancing supply chain stability beyond its capital market effects.

Abstract

This study explores the operational impact of non-financial disclosure, specifically whether corporate climate risk disclosure (CRD) helps mitigate the bullwhip effect (BWE) in supply chains. Grounded in signaling and stakeholder theories, the authors propose that high-quality CRD reduces inter-firm information asymmetry and signals stronger operational resilience, thereby dampening demand variability. Analyzing data from Chinese A-share listed manufacturing firms between 2013 and 2022, the study finds a significant negative relationship between CRD quality and the magnitude of the BWE. This effect is stronger in firms with better corporate governance. To address potential endogeneity, the study uses a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach based on the 2018 revision of China’s corporate governance guidelines and a two-stage least squares (2SLS) method. Results remain robust, highlighting CRD’s role in enhancing supply chain stability beyond its capital market effects.

발행기관:
한국리스크관리학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21480/tjrm.36.3.202509.001
분류:
경영학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Signaling in the Supply Chain: Can Climate Risk Disclosure Mitigate the Bullwhip Effect? Evidence from China | 리스크관리연구 2025 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI