결혼준비대행업 표준계약서의 한계 및 개선방안에 관한 연구 - 청약철회를 중심으로 -

In order to solve consumer problems arising in the marriage preparation agency market and establish a fair transaction order, the Fair Trade Commission enacted a standard contract for marriage preparation agency. These standard contracts include the provision of service details and price information, the specification of penalty standards, and the user's right to withdraw subscription. In this paper, the contents of the standard contract for marriage preparation agency and the contents of the three special transaction laws were compared and analyzed, focusing on withdrawal of subscription. However, the withdrawal of subscription stipulated in the marriage preparation agency standard contract is disadvantageous to consumers or imposes excessive obligations on businesses than those stipulated in the Special Transactions Act 3 in the following points. Therefore, amendments that faithfully reflect the Fair Trade Commission's three special transactions laws should be made so that the standard contract for marriage preparation agency can protect consumers and contribute to establishing a fair trade order in this market. First, the Special Transactions Act 3 stipulates that the base date of the withdrawal period is the date of receipt of goods as well as the issuance of the contract, but the standard contract stipulates the date of issuance of the contract. This shortens the withdrawal period stipulated in the Special Transactions Act 3 and is invalid because it is disadvantageous to consumers. Second, the right to withdraw subscription due to a simple change in the consumer's intention to purchase does not apply to contracts for the production of goods, etc., according to the consumer's individual order, but the standard contract recognizes the consumer's withdrawal of subscription without reviewing it. This corresponds to excessive consumer protection, and conversely, it imposes excessive losses on business operators. Third, the standard contract, consumers' withdrawal is recognized for marriage preparation agency contracts that are not subject to the regulation of the 3 Special Transactions Act. This is contrary to the establishment of a fair transaction order by burdening the marriage preparation agency for damages caused by withdrawal of subscription. Finally, in the case of a refund according to the withdrawal of subscription, the timing of the refund and the measures necessary for the refund are more disadvantageous to consumers than the contents of the 3 Special Transactions Act.