배우자 또는 특수관계자간 저가 및 고가 양도와 이월과세 및 부당행위계산부인 과세의 실효성에 대한 연구
A Study on the Effectiveness of Taxation on Asset Transfers at Lower or Higher Prices between Spouses or Related Parties, Taxation Carried Forward & Denial of Calculation by Wrongful Acts
정유석(인천대학교)
85호, 79~100쪽
초록
[연구목적]본 연구는 배우자 등 특수관계자간 자산의 저가 및 고가 양도거래에 대한 과세와 증여 후 일정기간내 수증자의 제 3자에 대한 양도시 양도소득세 이월과세와 부당행위계산부인 과세의 실효성 측면에서 문제점을 찾아보고 이에 대한 개선방안 제시를 연구목표로 삼고 있다. [연구방법]연구방법으로 유형별 가상의 거래사례를 통하여 배우자 등 특수관계자간 개인의 저가 및 고가 양도 과세와 증여 후 양도에 대한 이월과세 및 부당행위계산부인 과세적용에 따른 세부담을 개별적 양도와 증여에 대한 일반적인 과세 적용에서의 세부담의 차이를 비교 분석한다. [연구결과]고가양도시 양도세와 증여세의 이중과세에 따른 총부담세액보다 일반양도로 보아 양도소득세만 단독과세하는 경우가 더 큰 세부담을 보였다. 양도소득세와 증여세의 이중과세를 통한 중복 세부담의 조정효과가 고가양도에 대한 이중과세의 취지와 상충되는 결과로서 양도과세만 과세하는 경우보다 이중과세의 세부담이 더 낮은 결과를 보여 주었다. 현행 배우자 및 존비속간 이월과세와 특수관계자간 부당행위계산부인 규정이 있음에도 불구하고 실질적 적용기준에 부합하지 않아 결국에는 규정이 적용되지 않고 일반적 증여와 양도거래에 대한 개별과세 적용이 되는 결과를 얻었다. [연구의 시사점]연구결과에서와 같이 이월과세와 부당행위계산부인 규정의 실효성이 낮은만큼 이중과세와 중복 세부담의 조정이라는 복잡한 과세적용보다 오히려 양도소득세 또는 증여세의 단독과세 적용을 통한 과세구조의 단순화 제고방안이 더 바람직하다고 본다. 또한 이러한 과세 단순화는 고가양도를 통한 조세회피 방지의 효과와 취지를 제고하기 위한 보다 실효적 방안이 될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.
Abstract
[Purpose]In This study aims to find problems in terms of the effectiveness of taxation on asset transfer transactions at lower or higher prices between related parties such as spouses, the effectiveness of capital gains tax carried forward concerning the transfer of an asset to a third party by the donee within a certain period of time after the donation thereof, and the effectiveness of taxation on the denial of calculation by wrongful acts, thereby suggesting improvement measures for them. [Methodology]Through virtual transaction cases by type as research methods, we compare the tax burden due to taxation on asset transfer transactions at lower or higher prices between related parties such as spouses, taxation carried forward on the transfer of assets after the donation thereof, and taxation on the denial of calculation by wrongful acts with the tax burden due to the application of general taxation for individual transfers and donations and then analyze the differences between them. [Findings]In the case of the transfer of an asset at a higher price, the tax burden was greater when only the capital gains tax was levied as it was regarded as a general transfer rather than the total amount of tax due to double taxation of transfer tax and gift tax. This is a result of the effect of adjusting the overlapping tax burdens through double taxation of capital gains tax and gift tax conflicting with the purpose of double taxation on the transfer of an asset at a higher price, thus showing that the tax burden due to double taxation is lower than the case of levying only the transfer tax. Although there are provisions not only for taxation carried forward on the transfer of an asset between spouses or between ascendants and descendants and but also for taxation on the denial of calculation by wrongful acts on the transfer of an asset between related parties, such provisions were not applied because they did not meet the actual application standards, thus resulting in individual taxation for general donations and transfer transactions. [Implications]Since the effectiveness of capital gains tax carried forward and taxation on the denial of calculation by wrongful acts are low as shown in the results, it is more desirable to simplify the tax structure through the exclusive capital gains tax carried forward or gift tax rather than complicated application of double taxation and adjustment of overlapping tax burdens. In addition, it is judged that this simplification of taxation can be a more effective measure to enhance the effect and purpose of reventing tax avoidance through asset transfers at higher prices.
- 발행기관:
- 한국세무회계학회
- 분류:
- 세무회계