애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문동북아법연구2025.10 발행

Strategy for Defense and Evidence Presentation by Chinese Enterprises in Responding to U.S. Section 337 Intellectual Property Investigations

Strategy for Defense and Evidence Presentation by Chinese Enterprises in Responding to U.S. Section 337 Intellectual Property Investigations

왕하이옌(四川轻化工大学法学院讲师); 오월(사천과학기술대학교 법학원); 왕타오(사천과학기술대학교 법학원, 동아대학교 법학과)

19권 2호, 237~274쪽

초록

As a crucial tool for U.S. trade protectionism, the U.S. Section 337 Investigation is often used to file intellectual property (IP) infringement claims against enterprises from other countries. In recent years, Chinese enterprises have faced challenges such as a high rate of losing cases and insufficient experience in responding to Section 337 Investigations. This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the procedural characteristics and legal rules of the U.S. Section 337 Investigation, and systematically explores the defense paths and strategies for applying evidence rules for Chinese enterprises. The study finds that Chinese enterprises can start with core defense paths including IP invalidation declarations, infringement defenses, and reasonableness defenses. Meanwhile, in the practice of evidence rules, they should focus on the comparison of technical features, the proof of patent validity, and the construction of an evidence chain for independent research and development. Taking the successful case of JK Sucralose Inc. and Huawei as a starting point, this paper reveals that the response paradigm of “proactive response + systematic construction of evidence system + countermeasures based on procedural rules” is a relatively effective counterattack strategy for Chinese enterprises at present. Against the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, international competition has become increasingly fierce. Chinese enterprises are in urgent need of breaking through the trade barriers set by Section 337 Investigations by improving IP layout, strengthening the evidence management system, leveraging professional teams and policy support, so as to enhance their ability to deal with IP disputes in international competition. The research results of this paper not only provide valuable response ideas for Chinese enterprises facing Section 337 Investigations, but also offer useful references for policy-making and academic research in other countries.

Abstract

As a crucial tool for U.S. trade protectionism, the U.S. Section 337 Investigation is often used to file intellectual property (IP) infringement claims against enterprises from other countries. In recent years, Chinese enterprises have faced challenges such as a high rate of losing cases and insufficient experience in responding to Section 337 Investigations. This paper conducts an in-depth analysis of the procedural characteristics and legal rules of the U.S. Section 337 Investigation, and systematically explores the defense paths and strategies for applying evidence rules for Chinese enterprises. The study finds that Chinese enterprises can start with core defense paths including IP invalidation declarations, infringement defenses, and reasonableness defenses. Meanwhile, in the practice of evidence rules, they should focus on the comparison of technical features, the proof of patent validity, and the construction of an evidence chain for independent research and development. Taking the successful case of JK Sucralose Inc. and Huawei as a starting point, this paper reveals that the response paradigm of “proactive response + systematic construction of evidence system + countermeasures based on procedural rules” is a relatively effective counterattack strategy for Chinese enterprises at present. Against the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, international competition has become increasingly fierce. Chinese enterprises are in urgent need of breaking through the trade barriers set by Section 337 Investigations by improving IP layout, strengthening the evidence management system, leveraging professional teams and policy support, so as to enhance their ability to deal with IP disputes in international competition. The research results of this paper not only provide valuable response ideas for Chinese enterprises facing Section 337 Investigations, but also offer useful references for policy-making and academic research in other countries.

발행기관:
동북아법연구소
분류:
비교법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
Strategy for Defense and Evidence Presentation by Chinese Enterprises in Responding to U.S. Section 337 Intellectual Property Investigations | 동북아법연구 2025 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI