애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문회계학연구2025.10 발행

회계학에서 머신러닝 및 인공지능 활용에 관한 문헌 연구

Review on the Use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Accounting Research

임지혜(하와이 대학교 마노아); 나현종(한양대학교)

50권 5호, 233~272쪽

초록

본 연구는 2015년부터 2025년까지 10년간 머신러닝과 인공지능을 활용한 해외와 국내 회계학 연구의 현황을 체계적으로 분석하고 비교하여 국내 연구의 현재 위치를 진단하고 향후 발전 방향을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 해외 주요 회계학 학술지 와 국내 KCI 등재지의 논문을 선정하여, 논문에서 머신러닝(ML)과 인공지능(AI)을 활용한 유형을 주된 분류체계로 하고 연구분야와 활용 데이터를 보조적인 분류체계로 하는 문헌 검토를 수행하였다. 주된 분류 체계인 ML/AI 활용 유형은 예측, 측정, 설명, 처방 연구의 4개 영역으로 분류하였는데, 해외 연구는 2022년 이후 증가세를 보였으며 예측(37.7%), 측정(34.4%), 설명(13.1%), 그리고 처방(13.1%)을 목적으로 하는 연구들이 균형있게 발전하고 있다. 연구 주제별로는 감사(27.9%), 자본시장연구(24.6%), 재무보고(24.6%) 분야에서 고르게 발전하고 있으며, 데이터 유형별로는 정형 재무데이터(47.5%), 텍스트 데이터(21.3%), 대안데이터(18.0%)가 다양하게 활용되고 있다. 반면 국내 연구는 해외보다 3-4년의 시차를 두고 시작되었으며 규모와 질적 측면에서 상당한 격차를 보이고 있다. 국내 연구는 예측 중심 연구에 치중되어 있고(61.5%) 정형 재무데이터에 의존하고 있어(76.9%) 연구 영역의 다양성이 제한적이다. 더욱 중요한 것은 해외 연구가 새로운 측정 지표 개발과 창의적 연구 설계를 통해 회계학 이론의 외연을 확장하고 있는 반면, 국내 연구는 주로 기존 방법론의 성능 검증에 머물러 있다는 한계점을 지닌다. 본 연구는 ML/AI과 관련된 회계학 연구들을 활용 유형, 연구 주제, 데이터 유형이라는 다면적인 분류체계를 통해 ML/AI 기술이 회계학 연구에 미친 다층적 영향을 분석하였다. 또한, 해외와 국내 연구의 체계적 비교를 통해 국내 연구의 현재 위치와 발전 과제를 구체적으로 도출하였다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 예측 연구에서의 이론 기반 연구 설계, 측정 연구에서의 국내 고유 개념 정량화, 설명 연구에서의 대안데이터 활용을 통한 새로운 현상 발견, 처방 연구에서의 체계적 교육 방법론 개발이 필요하다는 점을 제시한다.

Abstract

This study (1) systematically analyzes and compares the current state of accounting research utilizing machine learning and artificial intelligence (ML/AI) technologies between international and domestic contexts from 2015 to 2025, (2) diagnoses the current position of domestic research, and (3) propose future development directions. The rapid advancement of ML/AI technologies has created unprecedented opportunities for accounting research to expand beyond traditional methodological boundaries, enabling researchers to address previously intractable questions and develop novel theoretical insights. Against this backdrop, understanding the current landscape and identifying research gaps becomes crucial for advancing the field. To achieve these objectives, we conducted a comprehensive literature review by selecting 61 papers from major international accounting journals and 13 papers from Korean Citation Index (KCI) registered journals. Our analysis employed a multidimensional classification framework consisting of three key dimensions: ML/AI utilization types, research topics, and data types. The ML/AI utilization types were further categorized into four distinct areas: predictive research (forecasting future outcomes), diagnostic research (quantifying previously unmeasurable concepts), descriptive research (discovering new phenomena through data exploration), and prescriptive research (developing practical solutions and recommendations). This comprehensive framework allows for a nuanced understanding of how ML/AI technologies are being integrated into accounting research across different methodological approaches. We find that international research has experienced dramatic growth since 2022, demonstrating a balanced development between predictive (37.7%), measurement (34.4%), descriptive (13.1%) and prescriptive (13.1%) research. The measurement research domain has achieved particularly innovative outcomes by quantifying previously unmeasurable concepts such as earnings virality, CEO depression, and voice delivery quality, thereby expanding the theoretical horizons of accounting research. These developments represent a shift in accounting research methodology, moving beyond traditional archival approaches to embrace data-driven, inductive methodologies that can uncover hidden patterns and relationships in financial data. By research topics, the development has been evenly distributed across auditing (27.9%), capital market research (24.6%), and financial reporting (24.6%), indicating a broad-based adoption of ML/AI technologies across different accounting subfields. In terms of data utilization, researchers have diversely employed structured financial data (47.5%), textual data (21.3%), and alternative data (18.0%), showcasing the versatility of ML/AI applications in processing various data formats and sources. In stark contrast, domestic research exhibits significant temporal and qualitative gaps compared to international counterparts. Korean accounting research in this domain began 3-4 years later than international research and shows substantial disparities in both scale and quality. Domestic research demonstrates a pronounced concentration on prediction-focused studies (61.5%) and reliance on structured financial data (76.9%), resulting in limited research scope and methodological approaches. More critically, while international research extends theoretical boundaries through the development of novel measurement indicators and creative research designs, domestic research primarily remains confined to performance verification of methodologies. This gap reflects deeper structural challenges including limited access to alternative data sources, insufficient interdisciplinary collaboration, or inadequate computational resources. The academic contributions of this study are threefold. First, this research represents the first systematic literature review of ML/AI-related accounting research, providing an objective assessment of the current status. By establishing a comprehensive baseline understanding, this study serves as a foundation for future research and policy development in this rapidly evolving field. Second, through our multidimensional classification framework encompassing utilization types, research topics, and data types, we analyze the multilayered impact of ML/AI technologies on accounting research. This framework provides a structured approach for understanding the diverse ways in which ML/AI can contribute to accounting knowledge and practice. Third, through systematic comparison between international and domestic research, we specifically identify the current position of domestic research and concrete development challenges, providing actionable insights for improving the research landscape. Our findings reveal that ML/AI technologies are driving a paradigm shift in accounting research methodology, enabling the quantification of previously unmeasurable concepts and suggesting the possibility of supplementally utilizing data-driven inductive approaches to discover new theoretical insights. This methodological evolution has important implications for how accounting researchers approach their work, moving from purely theory-driven deductive approaches to embracing the potential of data-driven discovery. Finally, this study proposes that future research development requires advancement across four key areas corresponding to our classification framework. In predictive research, there is a need for theory-based research designs that go beyond simple performance improvement to provide meaningful accounting insights. In measurement research, the quantification of domestically unique concepts that differentiate from international precedents could make significant contributions to accounting scholarship in the Korean context. In explanatory research, the utilization of alternative data to discover new phenomena represents a promising avenue for expanding accounting knowledge. In prescriptive research, the development of systematic educational methodologies is essential for building ML/AI capabilities within the accounting profession. Through these multifaceted approaches, we expect that domestic accounting research can play a more distinctive and leading role in the global ML/AI accounting research ecosystem, ultimately contributing to both theoretical advancement and practical improvement in accounting practice.

발행기관:
한국회계학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.24056/KAR.2025.10.005
분류:
회계학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
회계학에서 머신러닝 및 인공지능 활용에 관한 문헌 연구 | 회계학연구 2025 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI