외국 청렴 및 국민권익교육지원법제와 법제정의 효과 - UN부패방지협약, 미국, 영국, 프랑스, 홍콩의 입법례를 중심으로 -

The Prevention of Corruption and the Establishment and Management of the Anti-corruption and Civil Rights Commission Act, Improper Solicitation and Graft Act, and the Prevention of Conflict of Interest Related to Duties of Public Servants Act require public officials in public institutions to complete integrity and anti-corruption training. Integrity and anti-corruption training enhances national integrity, secures public trust in the public sector, and ensures fair performance of duties while prioritizing the public interest. Article 13 of the UN Convention against Corruption stipulates that integrity and corruption education should be implemented in primary and secondary schools, universities, and the general public to establish governance and promote lifelong corruption prevention. Furthermore, cooperation is needed to foster zero tolerance for corruption and to raise public awareness of the causes and seriousness of corruption. The US Ethics in Government Act requires that public officials be notified of integrity education, complete integrity education and integrity briefings, and monitor integrity education, depending on their level of service. The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, and the French Transparency, Anti-Corruption and Modernization Act provide for reduced or exemption from administrative penalties for employees who complete integrity education through a company's voluntary compliance program and for appropriate anti-corruption measures and disclosures. Article 74, Paragraph 1 of the UK's Education Inspection Act explicitly mandates integrity education in secondary education. Furthermore, Article 8, Paragraph 1 of the same act stipulates that student representatives participate as members of school management committees to ensure that integrity education policies reflect the needs of students. Articles 5 and 6 of the UK's Constitution and Government Act establish a code of conduct for public officials, ensuring that the values ​​of integrity-public service, integrity, objectivity, accountability, transparency, honesty, and leadership—are implemented. While the Hong Kong Anti-Bribery Ordinance does not explicitly provide for integrity and anti-corruption education, Article 12 of the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption Ordinance stipulates that school and social education be tailored to the life cycle. While neither Korea nor other countries have enacted a single law for integrity and public interest education support, this study examines foreign legislative precedents to explore implications for Korea. Furthermore, this study analyzes and examines the legal issues surrounding the failure to enact an integrity and public interest education support law and the legal ramifications of its enactment.